Why PLM Is Critical to Fabric Development
Rethinking How Fabrics Are Developed
Fabric development has become more complex, more data driven, and more time sensitive. Brands manage growing fabric libraries, tighter calendars, and rising expectations around quality, cost, and sustainability. Yet many development teams still rely on spreadsheets, emails, and shared folders to manage critical information.
This lack of structure slows decision making and increases risk. PLM addresses this by providing a digital foundation to manage fabrics, materials, color, testing, and supplier collaboration across the full development lifecycle.
The Core Challenges in Fabric Development
Brands face persistent pain points during development. Teams and suppliers often fragment fabric data. Lab dips, strike offs, and test reports live in different systems or no system at all. Version control issues slow approvals and increase risk.
Color remains one of the most difficult areas to manage. Inconsistent dye results between substrates, mills, and production runs lead to repeated sampling. Each additional round increases cost, extends lead times, and creates unnecessary waste.
Cost visibility is another challenge. Small changes in yarn count, fiber blend, or finishing process can significantly affect margin. Without early and continuous cost tracking, overruns surface late, when options are limited.
At the same time, brands must track certifications, chemical compliance, and sustainability attributes. Manual data collection makes audits slow, reactive, and difficult to validate.
How PLM Solves These Problems
PLM acts as a single source of truth for all fabric and material data. Teams manage fiber content, yarn specifications, fabric constructions, finishes, color standards, and testing requirements in one system.
As fabric development software, PLM replaces disconnected spreadsheets with structured records. Each fabric carries a complete development history, including lab dip submissions, approvals, test results, and supplier communications. This clarity reduces unnecessary lab dip and strike off rounds and shortens approval cycles between brand and mill.
PLM for material development also improves collaboration. Mills submit lab dips, test reports, and certifications directly into the platform. Development teams review, comment, and approve in real-time. Everyone works from the same approved data, which reduces rework and improves right-first-time color.
Material management software ensures fabrics move through defined stages. Teams decide when to approve materials for sampling, costing, or bulk production. This prevents premature commitments and creates a clear audit trail for testing, certifications, and approvals.
Digital Color Management with PLM and CLM
Managing color across fabrics, mills, and seasons requires more than visual approvals. Many brands now pair Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) with Color Lifecycle Management (CLM) to manage color using precise spectral data.
PLM acts as the central hub for materials and development workflows, while CLM manages the technical color data that ensures consistency from lab to production. When a color standard is created, its spectral data is captured and stored in CLM. That standard then links directly to fabrics, constructions, finishes, and suppliers in PLM.
As mills submit lab dips, spectrophotometer readings compare the sample against the approved standard and tolerance range. Teams review objective measurement results alongside visual assessments, all tied to the material record in PLM.
Because spectral data, submissions, approvals, and comments live in one workflow, mills and brands work from the same color target. Over time, the system builds a reusable color knowledge base, helping brands reduce sampling rounds, accelerate approvals, and improve bulk color consistency.
As brands expand digital product creation, PLM also manages digital fabric assets used in 3D design and virtual sampling. Material data from digital libraries, including platforms such as Swatchbook, can link directly to the same fabric records used for physical development. This ensures 3D materials, color standards, and physical fabrics stay aligned, supporting faster design validation while maintaining accurate production specifications.
Supporting Sustainability and Compliance
Modern textile development demands traceability. PLM stores certifications such as OEKO TEX, GRS, and REACH documentation at the material level.
Teams track fiber origin, chemical declarations, and test results alongside technical data. This creates a clear, auditable record that supports regulatory compliance and credible sustainability claims.
Building a Scalable Digital Foundation
As collections grow, development processes must scale. PLM provides the structure needed to manage hundreds or thousands of fabrics across seasons, regions, and product categories.
By replacing manual processes for fabric development with PLM, textile brands gain speed, visibility, and control. PLM becomes the digital backbone that supports innovation, margin protection, and long term growth.
Final Takeaway
The old way of managing fabric development relies on inboxes, spreadsheets, and fragmented systems. The modern way connects fabric, color, testing, and supplier collaboration in one platform.
If your fabric and color workflows still live in inboxes and spreadsheets, a PLM and Digital Color Approval stack is the fastest way to gain control of cost, speed, and sustainability.
-
Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) in PLM
Integrating Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) into PLM, giving brands and vendors real-time tools for collaboration, compliance, and efficiency.
-
Cotswold Industries Delivers Product Transparency with DeSL
Cotswold Industries has selected Discover e-Solutions (DeSL) to deliver Sustainability Certification and Compliance Management software.
-
Cotton Heritage Adopts DeSL’s Digital Platform
DeSL teams with Cotton Heritage to provide a strong digital solution to support their supply chain and company growth goals.
